Is Your Content Ready for Answer-Engines?

Benchmark your top pages against
the best in SaaS—and see what’s costing you visibility.

AEO Leaderboard

Who's winning in the age of AI answers? We analyzed the top 50 global SaaS brands to uncover which content is built for today’s answer engines—ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity—and which is falling behind.
Rank
Company
Overall

(0-100)
Authority & Evidence

Freshness
Structure
Snippet Extractability
Brand Alignment
1
#
1
NinjaOne
Overall
 (0-100)
82
Authority & Evidence

66

Authority &
Evidence

66

Roughly half of articles still lack named author bios and ≥2 authoritative outbound citations, limiting trust signals for Google and LLMs.

Score Distribution (

83

 pages)

5
34
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
90

Freshness

90

While most content has been modified in the last 90 days, ~12 % of pages still surface no visible update date or fall outside the freshness window.

Score Distribution (

83

 pages)

5
70
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
78

Structure / Schema /
Readability

78

Many pages omit an explicit single tag and rely on partial Article schema, which weakens semantic clarity and rich-result eligibility.

Score Distribution (

83

 pages)

5
74
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
79

Snippet Extractability

79

Long sentences (>25 words) and narrative paragraphs remain on 29 % of pages, reducing the likelihood of featured-snippet lifts.

Score Distribution (

83

 pages)

5
59
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
85

Brand Alignment

85

Thirteen pages provide generic how-to guidance without weaving in NinjaOne product use-cases, diluting brand reinforcement opportunities.

Score Distribution (

83

 pages)

5
60
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

2
#
2
ActiveCampaign
Overall
 (0-100)
79
Authority & Evidence

64

Authority &
Evidence

64

Roughly three-quarters of pages lack named author bios and ≥2 authoritative outbound citations, undermining E-E-A-T signals.

Score Distribution (

98

 pages)

5
25
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
92

Freshness

92

A small cluster of legacy/404 pages drag down freshness; they surface no visible updated dates or `dateModified` schema.

Score Distribution (

98

 pages)

5
88
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
80

Structure / Schema /
Readability

80

Heading hierarchy inconsistencies and missing Article/FAQPage schema limit rich-result eligibility.

Score Distribution (

98

 pages)

5
75
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
82

Snippet Extractability

82

Long, un-broken paragraphs dominate a quarter of pages, reducing the ease with which Google and LLMs can lift concise featured snippets.

Score Distribution (

98

 pages)

5
68
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
80

Brand Alignment

80

Many blog posts omit 2025 AI feature names and current pricing tiers, creating messaging drift versus the latest brand positioning.

Score Distribution (

98

 pages)

5
60
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

3
#
3
Asana
Overall
 (0-100)
79
Authority & Evidence

66

Authority &
Evidence

66

Roughly six in ten articles still lack named author bios or ≥ 2 authoritative outbound citations, limiting trust and LLM-citation potential.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
42
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
62

Freshness

62

Only 14 % of pages show an update within 90 days; dozens of 2023-era or dateless URLs (plus many 404s) drag down perceived recency.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
59
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
79

Structure / Schema /
Readability

79

About 20 pages still break heading hierarchy (e.g., multiple H1s or skipped levels) and omit full Article/FAQ schema, weakening semantic clarity.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
80
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
65

Snippet Extractability

65

Long (25 +-word) sentences and missing FAQ blocks mean more than half the portfolio is hard for Google/ChatGPT to lift concise answers from.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
42
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
90

Brand Alignment

90

Most pages align well, but unrefreshed templates and 404 resource URLs still feature pre-2025 messaging or lack any brand context.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
78
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

4
#
4
Shopify
Overall
 (0-100)
77
Authority & Evidence

84

Authority &
Evidence

84

Roughly two-thirds of articles rely on Shopify’s domain authority but lack named authors and ≥2 outbound citations, limiting trust for LLMs.

Score Distribution (

51

 pages)

5
43
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
85

Freshness

85

41 % of pages haven’t been refreshed in 90+ days or omit dateModified markup, reducing QDF and Helpful Content boosts.

Score Distribution (

51

 pages)

5
37
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
71

Structure / Schema /
Readability

71

Over half of posts still use only basic Article HTML and average >25-word sentences—missing full Article/FAQ schema and clean heading hierarchy.

Score Distribution (

51

 pages)

5
28
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
71

Snippet Extractability

71

Many pages bury answers in long paragraphs and lack FAQ blocks, hindering featured-snippet and AI Overview capture.

Score Distribution (

51

 pages)

5
26
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
67

Brand Alignment

67

58 % of articles omit 2025 AI-first features (Sidekick, Checkout Blocks) and new plan names, creating voice and CTA inconsistencies.

Score Distribution (

51

 pages)

5
22
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

5
#
5
Sprout Social
Overall
 (0-100)
76
Authority & Evidence

78

Authority &
Evidence

78

Roughly one-quarter of articles still lack named authors or ≥2 external citations, limiting their credibility with LLMs.

Score Distribution (

100

 pages)

5
73
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
74

Freshness

74

41 % of pages show publication dates older than six months or hide modified dates, weakening QDF and Helpful Content signals.

Score Distribution (

100

 pages)

5
59
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
78

Structure / Schema /
Readability

78

Only 4 % of pages implement full Article schema; many omit `dateModified` and `author` properties despite solid heading hierarchy.

Score Distribution (

100

 pages)

5
87
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
74

Snippet Extractability

74

Long, four-plus-sentence paragraphs still dominate 42 % of pages, limiting featured-snippet capture potential.

Score Distribution (

100

 pages)

5
58
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
75

Brand Alignment

75

Just under half of pages fail to reference 2025 AI features or updated pricing tiers, creating inconsistencies in brand messaging.

Score Distribution (

100

 pages)

5
52
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

6
#
6
monday.com
Overall
 (0-100)
76
Authority & Evidence

69

Authority &
Evidence

69

Roughly 40 % of articles lack named authors or ≥2 credible outbound citations, limiting perceived expertise and LLM citation likelihood.

Score Distribution (

28

 pages)

5
17
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
79

Freshness

79

About 20 % of content shows dates older than a year or no visible update stamp, weakening QDF and Helpful Content signals.

Score Distribution (

28

 pages)

5
19
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
73

Structure / Schema /
Readability

73

Support and community pages frequently use multiple H1 tags and omit full Article schema, reducing semantic clarity for search engines.

Score Distribution (

28

 pages)

5
20
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
71

Snippet Extractability

71

Long, unbroken paragraphs and missing FAQ/HowTo blocks persist on 46 % of pages, hampering featured-snippet capture.

Score Distribution (

28

 pages)

5
15
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
84

Brand Alignment

84

A handful of legacy tutorials reference 2021 feature sets and outdated CTAs, creating occasional brand-voice drift.

Score Distribution (

28

 pages)

5
20
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

7
#
7
Vercel
Overall
 (0-100)
75
Authority & Evidence

63

Authority &
Evidence

63

Roughly 7 in 10 pages lack both a named author bio and ≥2 outbound citations, limiting the content’s credibility for humans and LLMs.

Score Distribution (

86

 pages)

5
26
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
90

Freshness

90

Older blog articles (>1-year old) remain un-updated, dragging down freshness despite most docs being revised in the past 90 days.

Score Distribution (

86

 pages)

5
73
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
73

Structure / Schema /
Readability

73

Many pages omit full Article schema and some guides still use multiple tags, weakening semantic signals and rich-result eligibility.

Score Distribution (

86

 pages)

5
60
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
64

Snippet Extractability

64

Long paragraphs (>3 sentences) and sentences >25 words appear on 6 in 10 pages, reducing the likelihood of earning featured snippets.

Score Distribution (

86

 pages)

5
34
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
87

Brand Alignment

87

Legacy blog posts still reference ZEIT or omit 2025 product updates, creating inconsistencies with current Vercel positioning.

Score Distribution (

86

 pages)

5
68
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

8
#
8
Ramp
Overall
 (0-100)
74
Authority & Evidence

69

Authority &
Evidence

69

Most pages still lack ≥2 outbound citations and a visible expert byline, weakening trust signals for Google and LLMs.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
51
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
63

Freshness

63

Around 43 pages show no publish/updated date, limiting their ability to win QDF freshness boosts.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
51
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
80

Structure / Schema /
Readability

80

Only 14 pages include full Article or FAQ schema; most rely on good headings but miss structured-data richness.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
87
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
60

Snippet Extractability

60

Twenty pages still use ≥25-word sentences and lack concise Q&A blocks, reducing featured-snippet eligibility.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
74
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
89

Brand Alignment

89

A handful of legacy or competitor-focused pages carry outdated messaging, creating minor tone drift.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
77
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

9
#
9
BrowserStack
Overall
 (0-100)
74
Authority & Evidence

68

Authority &
Evidence

68

Roughly half the articles still lack named author bios and ≥ 2 outbound citations, limiting E-E-A-T signals for Google and LLM citations.

Score Distribution (

99

 pages)

5
47
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
79

Freshness

79

About one-third of pages expose no dateModified and haven’t been refreshed within 90 days, reducing QDF and Helpful-Content boosts.

Score Distribution (

99

 pages)

5
73
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
77

Structure / Schema /
Readability

77

Fourteen pages still score 60 due to missing H2 layers or only basic Article schema, weakening semantic clarity and rich-result eligibility.

Score Distribution (

99

 pages)

5
85
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
70

Snippet Extractability

70

Long, un-broken paragraphs dominate 56 pages, and FAQ/HowTo blocks are scarce—hindering featured-snippet capture and SGE lifts.

Score Distribution (

99

 pages)

5
43
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
69

Brand Alignment

69

Thirty-eight pages still cite outdated device counts or omit 2025 AI-driven Test Platform messaging, causing brand drift.

Score Distribution (

99

 pages)

5
43
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

10
#
10
Rippling
Overall
 (0-100)
72
Authority & Evidence

59

Authority &
Evidence

59

Only 14% of articles list a credentialed author or link to ≥2 authoritative sources, limiting E-E-A-T and LLM citation potential.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
19
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No authority signals.
40: Little trust; generic links; vague author.
60: Moderate authority (niche site) or 1 credible citation.
80: Any two of the above.
100: High-authority domain, strong credentials and ≥ 2 reputable citations.

Freshness
70

Freshness

70

31 legacy glossary pages surface no visible or schema dates, leaving one-third of the portfolio vulnerable to Google’s freshness bias.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
59
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No date signals
40: > 365 days
60: 181-365 days
80: 91-180 days
100 ≤ 90 days

Structure
75

Structure / Schema /
Readability

75

Four pages still contain multiple tags or missing blocks, and only 2% use full Article schema, constraining rich-result eligibility.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
73
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: No meaningful structure or schema.
40: Multiple <h1> or messy HTML, minimal schema; avg > 30 words.
60: Some hierarchy issues or only basic schema; avg s 30 words.
80: Minor heading gaps or partial schema; avg≤ 25 words.
100: Perfect hierarchy and full Article schema with all properties; avg s 20 words.

Snippet Extractability
78

Snippet Extractability

78

29 pages rely on 60-word paragraphs and sentences >25 words, reducing featured-snippet capture and generative answer extraction.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
67
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Wall of text; no lists, headings, or question patterns.
40:  Long paragraphs with few lists/Q&A; no obvious snippet targets.
60: Some lists or short Q&A lines, but large narrative chunks still dominate; engines can extract, but not effortlessly.
80: At least one strong extractable block plus good list/heading structure; minor issues (e.g., a few long sentences).
100: Multiple direct-answer blocks and most key facts in ≤ 25-word sentences. Page eligible for featured snippet or FAQ rich result.

Brand Alignment
83

Brand Alignment

83

25 pages omit 2025 messaging (e.g., Rippling+) or still reference outdated pricing, causing inconsistencies across comparison and glossary content.

Score Distribution (

96

 pages)

5
62
<80
>=80

Scoring Criteria

20: Completely off-brand.
40: Significant mismatch.
60: Some outdated or missing elements.
80: Minor tone/terminology drift.
100: Flawless alignment (or N/A if page isn’t brand-centric).

Want to see what separates the best?

Check out the 2025 Answer-Engine Benchmark Report

Read the Report

See Your Full Traffic Potential

Unlock a clear, actionable path to higher traffic through SEO and AEO visibility

Get the full picture, and a plan to move up the leaderboard

  • A full domain audit across AEO, SEO and your brand

  • Custom insights on how AI and SEO signals overlap

  • Clear next steps to increase traffic, citations and freshness

Fix Your Visibility Gap

See how your content stacks up. No fluff, just the insights you need to grow.

Book a call

FAQ

What is “agent-friendly” content?
How are the AEO scores calculated?
Why does AEO matter if I’m already ranking in Google?
What will I get in the AEO scorecard?
What happens after I get my scorecard?