Conductor monitors visibility. AirOps builds the content engine that wins AI search and SEO.
- Daily AI visibility tracking, not weekly rank updates
- Unified AI search and SEO analytics, not separate fragmented dashboards
- Visual workflow orchestration at scale, not task assignments
Webflow 5xed content refresh velocity and increased visibility across Google and ChatGPT
Chime went from being recommended in 24 to 68 priority questions
George Bonaci VP of Growth, Ramp
Nicole Baer, CMO, Carta
50% cut in production costs, thanks to the elimination of external agencies and manual tasks.
Marcio Arnecke, CMO, Apollo
Why Customers Choose AirOps to Go Beyond Visibility
Watching trends while traffic slips away is not a winning strategy. Only AirOps gives you the system to produce quality content that earns citations.
and agents alike
Get prime placement in AI Search by improving the structure, clarity, and quality of your content.
Brand Kits
Create content that sounds like your brand by weaving in your brand voice, personas, and expertise.
Our experts help brands like Carta and Rippling build workflows and train their teams to move faster with confidence.
What sets AirOps apart from Conductor
Conductor is a "Command Center" for observation and governance. AirOps is an execution engine. AirOps combines daily AI visibility, unified analytics (Page360), and workflow orchestration (Grid + Workflows) so teams create, refresh, and optimize content at scale in one system.
What our customers are saying
“AirOps is unlike any other AI tool we’ve seen. We’ve been able to drop our agency and focus on the highest value initiatives in weeks”
Nick Fairbain
VP Growth Marketing, Chime
“Our brand visibility score hit a high of 28% after we refreshed content. We saw a 56% increase in subscriptions in 30 days that corresponds to content engineered for agents."
George Bonaci
VP of Growth and Demand, Ramp
“With AirOps, we grew AI-attributed signups from 2% to over 10% in under a year with zero headcount growth. Just sharper workflows and faster loops.”
Josh Grant
VP of Growth, Webflow
AirOps vs. Conductor
Which platform is right for your team?
AirOps gives you the complete picture: AI visibility and SEO in one place
Conductor's "Unified Data Engine" splits intelligence across separate products (Intelligence, Creator, Monitoring) that don't talk to each other. AirOps Page360 unifies SEO metrics, web analytics, and AI search signals in one view, giving you the complete picture without switching tools.
Native visual workflow builder, not just handoffs to task tools
Conductor's workflows rely on linear handoffs: insight to brief to task assignment in Jira. AirOps native Workflow Studio and Grids let teams orchestrate complex content operations at scale without technical handoffs.
Pre-built, reusable
workflow components
Connect AirOps with your entire stack from day one
Legacy enterprise platform with limited CMS breadth and task management focus. AirOps connects to 30+ platforms across data warehouses, 7 modern CMS systems, and your full marketing stack as the execution layer your team actually uses.
SEVERAL CMS platforms
(Webflow, Contentful,
WordPress, Ghost,
and more)
AirOps pairs hands-on support with built-in enablement
Conductor provides 24/5 phone support to navigate platform complexity. AirOps offers live training, expert onboarding, and in-product Copilot that helps teams build and improve workflows independently. AirOps builds capability, not dependency.
How Webflow scaled content 5x in days with AirOps
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better: AirOps or Conductor?
AirOps is better for teams that need to scale content operations with automated workflows, unified analytics, and daily AI visibility tracking. Conductor is better suited for large enterprises requiring ISO 42001 certification and deep technical SEO monitoring, but it operates as a "Command Center" for observation rather than an execution engine. If you need to watch what's happening, Conductor tells you. If you need to fix it at scale, AirOps does it.
What features does AirOps offer that Conductor does not?
AirOps offers several capabilities Conductor lacks:
- Visual Workflow Studio for multi-step content pipelines with branching logic, human review, and error handling
- Grid for bulk content operations (hundreds/thousands of rows simultaneously)
- Daily AI search data updates (Conductor defaults to weekly rank tracking)
- Page360 unified analytics combining AI citations, GSC, and GA4 in one view (Conductor splits across Intelligence, Creator, Monitoring)
- Knowledge Bases for grounding AI in proprietary databases and documents
- 7 native CMS integrations (Webflow, WordPress, Contentful, Ghost, Sanity, Strapi, ContentStack)
- 20+ AI model options with full control and API flexibility (Conductor uses purpose-built, black-box AI)
- Power Agents (pre-built, reusable workflow components)
Does Conductor just show optimization scores, or can it actually automate the fixes?
Conductor shows you what needs fixing through Content Score, AI Topic Map, and Content Guidance, then offers connected workflows that move insights to Writing Assistant or send briefs to Jira/Asana for task assignment. Complex operations require their MCP server or API integrations with external tools.
AirOps automates the entire workflow: Page360 identifies underperforming pages, Grid runs multi-step optimization workflows across hundreds of pages simultaneously with human review checkpoints, and publishes updates directly to your CMS. Conductor guides you to better content. AirOps builds the system that creates it.
How do AirOps workflows differ from Conductor's automation?
Conductor offers "connected workflows" that create linear handoffs (Topic Map to Writing Assistant to Jira brief) but lacks a visual automation builder. Bulk operations and agentic capabilities require their API/MCP server connecting to external LLMs. There is no native autonomous agent builder UI within the platform.
AirOps provides a visual Workflow Studio for creating multi-step content pipelines with branching logic, loops, human review steps, and code execution. Grid then executes these workflows across hundreds or thousands of rows simultaneously and publishes directly to 7+ CMS platforms without developer resources or tool switching.
How does AirOps track AI search visibility compared to Conductor?
Both platforms track AI visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI platforms, but AirOps provides daily answer frequency for tracked prompts while Conductor defaults to weekly rank tracking (daily requires specific configuration).
AirOps Page360 unifies AI search citations, Google Search Console data, and Google Analytics engagement metrics in one view. Conductor splits analytics across separate products: Conductor Intelligence for AI Search Performance, Conductor Creator for content operations, and Conductor Monitoring for technical health. Page360's unified approach surfaces high-impact optimization opportunities that remain invisible when these metrics live in separate dashboards.
Can AirOps replace both Conductor and my content creation tools?
Yes. AirOps replaces multiple tools by combining daily AI visibility tracking, visual workflow orchestration, bulk content operations through Grid, 7 native CMS integrations, Brand Kits, Knowledge Bases, and team collaboration in one system.
Teams using Conductor still need separate tools for visual workflow automation (no native builder), bulk programmatic operations (API/MCP for external agents), and connecting to modern CMS platforms beyond Drupal/Acquia. Conductor positions itself as the "Command Center" for observation. AirOps is the Content Engineering Platform for execution.
What's the pricing difference between AirOps and Conductor?
Conductor uses opaque, value-based pricing with no published list pricing. Third-party reviews cite monthly costs in the $5,000 to $10,000 range. AI Search Performance access is tied to usage-based "AI Response Credits," and pricing scales with the number of pages/URLs, depth of insights, and features like daily rank tracking (weekly is default). Long-term contracts and sales conversations are required.
AirOps offers transparent tiered pricing (Solo, Pro, Enterprise) with 50,000 free testing tasks to start. Enterprise tier includes Custom Agent Builds and Dedicated Account Manager. You get granular cost control through task-based billing and the option to bring your own AI model keys, making variable costs predictable as you scale.
The real difference: Conductor charges enterprise premiums for observation and governance. AirOps gives you the execution engine at a lower total cost of ownership.
How hard is Conductor to operationalize day to day?
Conductor requires significant configuration to operationalize beyond individual page analysis. Third-party reviews cite a steep learning curve and "clunky" UI due to platform breadth. Bulk operations require API integration work, workflow automation relies on linear handoffs to external tools (Jira/Asana), and there is no native visual builder for custom automation. Daily rank tracking requires specific configuration (weekly is default). Conductor mitigates complexity through expert-led onboarding and 24/5 support.
AirOps is built for daily operations with a visual Workflow Studio for multi-step pipelines, Grid for bulk content management accessible to non-developers, 7 native CMS integrations, daily AI data updates by default, and unlimited seats for team collaboration. The in-product Copilot helps teams build and improve workflows as they work.