AppsFlyer Organic Growth Opportunities
1. Readiness Assessment
1. Readiness Assessment
2. Competitive Analysis
2. Competitive Analysis
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
4. Appendix
4. Appendix
Readiness Assessment
Current Performance
- You drive about 45k monthly organic visits from 19k ranking keywords, with traffic valued at roughly $184k/mo in equivalent ad spend.
- Your authority is strong (Authority Score 58) and supported by a large backlink footprint (about 31k referring domains), giving you solid ability to rank with additional content investment.
- Traffic is concentrated in brand + educational content: the homepage pulls ~12k visits (~27%), while top non-brand pages are mostly glossary/blog (e.g., /glossary/roas/ ~3k, “return on experience” ~2k, “lookback window” ~2k); top keywords include “appsflyer”, “app flyer”, and non-brand terms like “roas”.
Growth Opportunity
- You’re the clear #2 vs direct competitors, but Adjust leads with ~112k visits and 42k keywords (~2.5× your traffic), signaling meaningful headroom primarily via broader keyword coverage.
- Brand queries drive an outsized share, so expanding non-brand, high-intent topic clusters (attribution/MMP, deep linking/OneLink, ROAS/LTV, CTV, fraud protection) and tying them to product/pricing pages is the fastest path to incremental demand.
- Several high-volume navigational/support terms (e.g., “my apps”/“myapps”, SDK/deeplink queries) suggest opportunities to improve rankings and SERP ownership for docs/support pages and convert that demand into product adoption.
Assessment
You already have the authority and content foundation to scale, but you’re leaving substantial non-brand visibility on the table relative to the category leader. The biggest upside is systematic expansion of glossary/docs/product-led content to grow your keyword footprint and reduce reliance on branded searches. AirOps can help you execute this kind of airops-powered growth programmatically and consistently at scale.
Competition at a Glance
Analysis of 2 direct competitors (Adjust and Branch) shows AppsFlyer competing in a landscape where one player holds a clear organic visibility lead. Across the three domains measured, AppsFlyer generates 44,617 monthly organic visits from 19,009 ranking keywords.
AppsFlyer currently ranks #2 of 3 for both organic search traffic and ranking keywords. The top-performing competitor is Adjust, with 112,435 monthly organic visits and 42,143 ranking keywords—about 2.5× AppsFlyer’s traffic and 2.2× its keyword coverage.
Overall market position indicates AppsFlyer is firmly ahead of Branch (traffic and keyword breadth), but the primary competitive gap is concentrated against Adjust, whose advantage appears driven by much broader keyword footprint that translates into proportionally higher traffic. This frames AppsFlyer as a strong #2 with meaningful headroom to close the visibility gap with the category leader while maintaining separation from the smaller competitor.
Opportunity Kickstarters
Here are your content opportunities, tailored to your domain's strengths. These are starting points for strategic plays that can grow into major traffic drivers in your market. Connect with our team to see the full traffic potential and activate these plays.
A programmatic directory of implementation-grade landing pages for every ad network and technology partner in the AppsFlyer ecosystem. These pages provide structured setup guides, tracking parameters, and capability checklists that bridge the gap between marketing intent and technical execution.
Example Keywords
- "{partner} attribution integration"
- "{partner} postback setup"
- "{partner} S2S postback parameters"
- "{partner} cost reporting integration"
Rationale
Buyers and implementers search for specific partner capabilities during vendor evaluation and onboarding. By providing structured, SEO-optimized versions of technical documentation, AppsFlyer can capture late-funnel intent from users looking to connect their marketing stack.
Topical Authority
AppsFlyer's existing success with reference content, such as their glossary, proves they are a trusted source for measurement implementation. Their high domain authority (AS 58) supports ranking for these technical long-tail queries.
Internal Data Sources
Utilize the internal partner/integration catalog, existing support KB articles, and developer documentation to provide unique, fact-checked technical specs.
Estimated Number of Pages
60,000+ (Covering thousands of partners across various platforms, tracking methods, and ad formats)
A collection of vertical-specific landing pages that offer "blueprints" for measurement, including recommended event taxonomies and KPI frameworks. Each page is tailored to a specific industry and use case, providing a tangible implementation plan for prospective buyers.
Example Keywords
- "mobile measurement platform for {industry}"
- "{industry} user acquisition measurement"
- "{industry} subscription measurement"
- "{industry} marketing analytics stack"
Rationale
Decision-makers often search for solutions tailored to their specific niche (e.g., Fintech, Gaming, QSR). Providing a vertical-specific blueprint increases conversion potential by demonstrating immediate relevance to the buyer's business model.
Topical Authority
AppsFlyer's existing solutions infrastructure and extensive library of customer case studies provide the necessary credibility to own vertical-specific measurement conversations.
Internal Data Sources
Leverage customer case studies, Performance Index reports, and internal sales RFP response banks to offer differentiated, industry-specific insights.
Estimated Number of Pages
90,000+ (Covering hundreds of sub-verticals across multiple use cases and regions)
A massive, searchable directory of marketing performance benchmarks sliced by geography, vertical, and channel. These pages provide practitioners with the data they need to justify budgets and compare their performance against industry standards.
Example Keywords
- "{country} {vertical} install benchmark {year}"
- "{channel} performance benchmark for {vertical}"
- "{metric} benchmark {vertical} Q{n} {year}"
- "average retention rate for {industry} apps"
Rationale
Marketers constantly search for "what good looks like" to benchmark their own campaigns. This play leverages AppsFlyer's unique data moat to create thousands of high-value reference pages that are frequently cited and shared.
Topical Authority
As a leading MMP, AppsFlyer is a primary source for ecosystem data. Scaling their existing report-based authority into a programmatic directory is a natural extension of their brand.
Internal Data Sources
Use aggregated, anonymized benchmark datasets from the AppsFlyer platform and historical Performance Index data.
Estimated Number of Pages
140,000+ (Covering hundreds of geos, verticals, and channels over multiple timeframes)
A technical library of SQL templates and data modeling guides designed to help data analysts extract value from attribution exports. Each page provides runnable code for common marketing questions like payback periods, blended CAC, and cohort analysis.
Example Keywords
- "SQL to calculate payback period marketing"
- "blended CAC SQL template"
- "BigQuery attribution analysis query"
- "Snowflake app marketing analytics schema"
Rationale
Data analysts are critical stakeholders in the enterprise buying process. By providing high-utility technical assets, AppsFlyer builds trust with the users who will ultimately manage the data integration.
Topical Authority
AppsFlyer's authority in measurement concepts allows them to move down the stack into the technical "how-to" of data analysis and warehouse modeling.
Internal Data Sources
Utilize raw export schemas, field dictionaries, and internal analytics templates used by AppsFlyer's own data solutions teams.
Estimated Number of Pages
60,000+ (Covering hundreds of business questions across various warehouses and BI tools)
A forensic troubleshooting guide that maps common marketing dashboard anomalies to specific types of ad fraud and remediation steps. This play targets users experiencing active issues with their campaign data.
Example Keywords
- "click injection detection"
- "install hijacking prevention"
- "abnormal click to install time troubleshooting"
- "bot install detection mobile ads"
Rationale
When marketers see suspicious patterns, they search for symptoms. This play captures high-intent troubleshooting traffic and positions AppsFlyer's Protect360 as the necessary solution for fraud prevention.
Topical Authority
AppsFlyer's established Protect360 product and existing fraud-related documentation provide a strong foundation for owning the fraud remediation space.
Internal Data Sources
Leverage anonymized fraud signal patterns, support case taxonomies, and internal product configuration knowledge bases.
Estimated Number of Pages
90,000+ (Covering hundreds of symptoms across various channel types and remediation paths)
Improvements Summary
Update the CTV/VOD, programmatic, and ad measurement glossary pages with snippet-ready definitions, stronger section structure, comparison assets, and FAQ + DefinedTerm/Article schema. Add two hub pages and expand internal links between glossary entries, related blog posts, and OTT/programmatic use-case pages.
Improvements Details
Tighten each page to a primary query and rewrite intros as a 40–60 word definition plus bullet takeaways; prioritize pages targeting "svod meaning", "tvod meaning", "pvod on demand", "programmatic tv advertising", and "programmatic guaranteed". Add comparison tables (SVOD vs TVOD vs AVOD vs PVOD; PMP vs Programmatic Guaranteed; VTR vs VCR), formula boxes ("how to calculate ecpm", VTR), examples, misconceptions, and 4–6 FAQs with schema; fix /glossary/bvod/ to focus on "broadcast video on demand" and drop irrelevant "b vdo" noise. Build /glossary/video-on-demand/ and /glossary/programmatic-tv-ctv/ hubs, add missing entries (AVOD, CTV advertising, OTT advertising, attribution window, CPM vs eCPM), and add bidirectional links from relevant measurement and programmatic blog posts and OTT media buying pages.
Improvements Rationale
These pages show low traffic share despite low competition, which points to thin content, weak snippet formatting, and limited topical authority rather than demand gaps. Stronger on-page structure, clearer keyword focus, and hub-to-node internal linking can move rankings from page 2 to page 1 and win featured snippets, while high-CPC terms like programmatic TV can drive higher-intent visits.
Appendix
| Keyword | Volume | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| best seo tools | 5.0k | 3 |
| seo strategy | 4.0k | 5 |
| keyword research | 3.5k | 2 |
| backlink analysis | 3.0k | 4 |
| on-page optimization | 2.5k | 1 |
| local seo | 2.0k | 6 |
| Page | Traffic | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| /seo-tools | 5.0k | 100 |
| /keyword-research | 4.0k | 100 |
| /backlink-checker | 3.5k | 80 |
| /site-audit | 3.0k | 60 |
| /rank-tracker | 2.5k | 50 |
| /content-optimization | 2.0k | 40 |
Ready to Get Growing?
Request access to the best–in–class growth strategies and workflows with AirOps