Check Point Software Organic Growth Opportunities
1. Readiness Assessment
1. Readiness Assessment
2. Competitive Analysis
2. Competitive Analysis
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
4. Appendix
4. Appendix
Readiness Assessment
Current Performance
- You rank for 111k organic keywords and drive ~156k monthly organic visits (traffic value ~$1.1m), but brand demand is a meaningful share (e.g., “checkpoint” / “check point” terms).
- Your Authority Score is 58, supported by a very large link footprint (≈5.7m backlinks from 58k referring domains), indicating strong domain credibility to build on.
- Top traffic drivers skew informational + navigational: / (homepage) (~30k visits, ~19%), Cyber Hub “what is cybersecurity” (~15k, ~10%), ThreatMap (~9k), plus VPN and cloud security explainers; top keywords include “cyber security”, “cybersecurity”, “harmony portal”, and “checkpoint vpn.”
Growth Opportunity
- You’re underrepresented vs peers: across Cisco/Palo Alto/Fortinet comparisons you’re 4th in both organic traffic (~156k) and ranking keywords (~111k), while cisco.com captures ~2.1m visits from ~729k keywords—showing a large addressable search gap.
- Double down on non-brand, high-intent commercial content (comparisons, “best X,” product-led use cases for firewall/SASE/endpoint/email security) to translate your keyword footprint into more visits.
- Systematize expansion of Cyber Hub topic clusters (cloud security, ransomware, IPS/IDS, zero trust, VPN) and connect them more tightly to solution pages to improve conversion and demand capture.
Assessment
You have strong authority and a large content base, but you’re not converting it into competitive share of voice yet. The gap vs top competitors suggests meaningful upside if you invest in scalable, bottom-funnel content and internal linking. AirOps can help you execute that programmatically and consistently across hundreds of topics.
Competition at a Glance
Analysis of 3 major competitors (Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, and Cisco) shows checkpoint.com is currently underrepresented in organic search visibility versus the peer set.
Across the 4 domains compared, checkpoint.com ranks 4th in monthly organic traffic (156,351 visits) and 4th in ranking keywords (110,718 keywords). The top performer is cisco.com, generating 2,070,141 monthly organic visits from 729,171 ranking keywords, putting Check Point at a sizable disadvantage in overall search reach.
Market-position wise, the gap is not just about ranking for fewer terms—competitors are also translating their keyword footprint into disproportionately more visits, suggesting stronger overall organic visibility and demand capture. In practical terms, checkpoint.com is competing from a smaller organic “share of voice,” while the leaders occupy significantly more of the search landscape across cybersecurity topics and product areas.
Opportunity Kickstarters
Here are your content opportunities, tailored to your domain's strengths. These are starting points for strategic plays that can grow into major traffic drivers in your market. Connect with our team to see the full traffic potential and activate these plays.
A massive library of pages dedicated to individual CVEs, providing immediate impact analysis, detection signals, and specific Check Point mitigation steps. This positions the brand as the first responder for security teams searching for urgent workarounds and protection rules.
Example Keywords
- "CVE-2025-XXXX mitigation"
- "CVE-2024-XXXX detection rules"
- "how to block CVE-XXXX with IPS"
- "WAF rules for CVE-XXXX exploit"
Rationale
Security practitioners search for specific CVE IDs immediately after a vulnerability is disclosed to find actionable defense steps. By providing these technical details at scale, checkpoint.com can capture high-intent traffic from defenders during critical windows.
Topical Authority
Check Point already maintains a high Authority Score (58) and dedicated research properties like research.checkpoint.com and advisories.checkpoint.com, making them a trusted source for vulnerability intelligence.
Internal Data Sources
Leverage Check Point Research writeups, ThreatCloud AI telemetry, IPS signature databases, and technical advisories from the sc1.checkpoint.com/documents repository.
Estimated Number of Pages
25,000+ (Covering historical and newly released CVEs with product-specific variants)
A comprehensive directory mapping specific regulatory requirements (like NIS2, DORA, and CMMC) to granular security controls and Check Point implementation guides. This targets compliance officers and IT directors looking for evidence-based ways to meet new legal mandates.
Example Keywords
- "NIS2 Article 21 security measures"
- "DORA ICT risk management requirements"
- "CMMC Level 2 firewall controls"
- "PCI DSS 4.0 network segmentation implementation"
Rationale
Compliance is a primary driver for enterprise security spending, and professionals search for specific article or control numbers to understand implementation. Mapping these directly to product capabilities creates a clear path from regulation to purchase.
Topical Authority
The domain already ranks for broad compliance terms like "SOC 2 compliance," and its extensive industry-specific sections provide a strong foundation for regulatory expertise.
Internal Data Sources
Utilize Trust Point certification data, internal compliance matrices, product documentation for logging and policy enforcement, and existing customer success stories.
Estimated Number of Pages
5,000+ (Covering various global regulations, specific articles, and control-level mappings)
A scaled collection of step-by-step integration guides for connecting Check Point products with the broader IT and security stack. These pages provide the exact API calls, log forwarding configurations, and workflow automations required for modern security operations.
Example Keywords
- "Splunk integration with Check Point Quantum"
- "forwarding Check Point logs to Microsoft Sentinel"
- "Check Point Management API Python examples"
- "ServiceNow incident automation with Check Point"
Rationale
Implementers and architects frequently search for specific integration steps between vendors. Providing these technical "recipes" captures users who are already using or evaluating the platform and looking for interoperability.
Topical Authority
With over 21 technology partners already listed and a massive documentation footprint (sc1.checkpoint.com), Check Point is naturally positioned as a hub for security ecosystem integration.
Internal Data Sources
Extract data from Management API documentation, partner enablement guides, validated reference architectures, and community troubleshooting patterns.
Estimated Number of Pages
10,000+ (Covering hundreds of third-party tools across multiple Check Point product lines and use cases)
A technical library of detection rules and hunting queries (SPL, KQL, Sigma) mapped to specific attacker behaviors and techniques. This targets SOC engineers and threat hunters looking for ready-to-use logic to find threats in their environments.
Example Keywords
- "detect Kerberoasting with KQL"
- "Sigma rule for Process Injection"
- "Splunk query for lateral movement detection"
- "detecting OAuth token theft in Entra ID"
Rationale
Detection engineering is a high-growth field where practitioners search for specific query logic. Providing these at scale drives repeat technical traffic and showcases the depth of Check Point’s threat intelligence.
Topical Authority
Check Point Research is a globally recognized authority on TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures), providing the necessary credibility to offer detection logic.
Internal Data Sources
Use Check Point Research TTP analyses, ThreatCloud AI categorization data, and internal telemetry schemas from Infinity and CloudGuard platforms.
Estimated Number of Pages
30,000+ (Covering hundreds of techniques across various log sources and query languages)
A catalog of infrastructure-as-code (IaC) snippets and guardrails designed to prevent cloud misconfigurations. Each page provides the code (Terraform/Rego) to fix a specific risk and explains how to enforce it using CloudGuard.
Example Keywords
- "Terraform to prevent public S3 buckets"
- "Azure policy for disk encryption enforcement"
- "Kubernetes network policy examples for EKS"
- "preventing IAM privilege escalation in AWS"
Rationale
Cloud engineers search for specific code snippets to solve security findings. By providing these snippets, Check Point can intercept developers and security engineers at the moment they are fixing cloud risks.
Topical Authority
The brand’s significant investment in CloudGuard and its existing sitemap footprint in CNAPP and CSPM provide the topical relevance needed to rank for cloud implementation queries.
Internal Data Sources
Leverage CloudGuard posture rule rationale, reference architectures, workshop materials, and internal IaC remediation libraries.
Estimated Number of Pages
15,000+ (Covering major cloud providers, hundreds of services, and thousands of risk patterns)
Improvements Summary
Standardize all threat explainer/profile pages with a consistent “Threat Profile” structure (TL;DR + updated date, definition, how-it-works, vectors, MITRE ATT&CK table, IOCs, detection/response checklist, prevention, FAQs, and a small “How Check Point helps” module). Expand each page’s keyword footprint and snippet readiness with comparison blocks, PAA-style FAQs, stronger first 150 words, and supporting schema (Article, Breadcrumb, FAQPage).
Improvements Details
Rewrite openings to answer intent immediately, then add sections for infection vectors, TTPs (mapped to MITRE ATT&CK), targeting, IOCs, and step-based mitigation; apply this template across pages like “malware as a service”, “cyber soc”, “nanocore rat”, and “8base ransomware”. Add comparison blocks (MaaS vs RaaS, RAT vs Trojan vs Backdoor, SOC vs NOC, SIEM vs SOAR) plus 5–8 exact-question FAQs with short answers to win Featured Snippets/PAA. Build a “Threat Library” hub with taxonomy and breadcrumbs, add “Related threats” modules on profiles, and add contextual internal links from ThreatMap and relevant product pages with varied descriptive anchors; also tighten H1s, titles/meta, TOCs, and add author/reviewer + citations for freshness and trust signals.
Improvements Rationale
Most pages show near-zero click share on non-brand terms, which typically signals page-2 placement and weaker “best answer” alignment (depth, structure, freshness, and snippet formatting). A repeatable template plus semantic expansions and FAQ/comparison formatting gives search engines clearer topic coverage and improves snippet eligibility. Strong internal linking and a hub taxonomy help consolidate topical authority across the library, improving rankings for lower-competition terms and lifting broader head terms over time.
Appendix
| Keyword | Volume | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| best seo tools | 5.0k | 3 |
| seo strategy | 4.0k | 5 |
| keyword research | 3.5k | 2 |
| backlink analysis | 3.0k | 4 |
| on-page optimization | 2.5k | 1 |
| local seo | 2.0k | 6 |
| Page | Traffic | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| /seo-tools | 5.0k | 100 |
| /keyword-research | 4.0k | 100 |
| /backlink-checker | 3.5k | 80 |
| /site-audit | 3.0k | 60 |
| /rank-tracker | 2.5k | 50 |
| /content-optimization | 2.0k | 40 |
Ready to Get Growing?
Request access to the best–in–class growth strategies and workflows with AirOps