Close Organic Growth Opportunities
1. Readiness Assessment
1. Readiness Assessment
2. Competitive Analysis
2. Competitive Analysis
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
4. Appendix
4. Appendix
Readiness Assessment
Current Performance
- You rank for ~32k organic keywords and drive ~32k monthly organic visits (traffic value ~$167k in equivalent ad spend)
- Your visibility is heavily brand-led: “close” (SV 135k) and “close crm” (SV 4k) are the top traffic drivers, alongside navigational terms like “close crm login”
- Authority is solid but not category-leading: Authority Score 45 with ~228k backlinks from ~11k referring domains, giving you a good foundation to grow rankings
Growth Opportunity
- You’re underrepresented vs. the category leader: you sit at #3 among key competitors, while HubSpot drives ~1.6m organic visits—showing a large addressable traffic gap if you expand coverage beyond brand demand
- Your top pages skew to brand + TOFU content (homepage ~13k visits; “sales motivation quotes” ~2k; changelog ~1k; sales reporting/SMB definition posts), suggesting room to build more BOFU acquisition pages (e.g., “CRM software,” “cold email software,” “predictive dialer,” comparisons, and integrations)
- Your sitemap shows major content scale potential (hundreds of blog, sales glossary, and localized fr/es/de/pt URLs); investing in systematic content production + internal linking can turn this footprint into materially higher non-brand traffic
Assessment
You have a credible authority and backlink base, but organic growth is constrained by a heavy reliance on brand queries and a limited share of category-level demand. The gap to competitors indicates meaningful upside if you expand and systematize non-brand, high-intent content and landing pages. AirOps can help you execute this at scale with repeatable, keyword-driven content programs.
Competition at a Glance
Across an analysis of 2 direct competitors (Pipedrive and HubSpot Sales Hub), close.com currently drives 32,346 monthly organic visits from 32,474 ranking keywords, indicating a smaller overall search visibility footprint within this competitive set.
In this 3-brand comparison, close.com ranks #3 in organic search traffic and #3 in ranking keywords. The top-performing competitor is HubSpot Sales Hub, with 1,645,336 monthly organic visits and 852,556 ranking keywords, highlighting a very large gap in both reach and breadth of topics covered.
Overall market visibility is heavily concentrated with the leader, and close.com holds only a small portion of the combined organic presence (roughly ~1.8% of traffic and ~3.4% of ranking keywords). The data also suggests competitors translate their broader keyword coverage into disproportionately higher traffic, reinforcing that Close is currently underrepresented in organic discovery across the category’s demand.
Opportunity Kickstarters
Here are your content opportunities, tailored to your domain's strengths. These are starting points for strategic plays that can grow into major traffic drivers in your market. Connect with our team to see the full traffic potential and activate these plays.
This play creates a massive library of role-specific landing pages that map Close’s CRM capabilities to the unique daily workflows of different sales personas. By combining LinkedIn-derived job responsibilities with internal product data, Close can position itself as the 'Operating System' for specific roles.
Example Keywords
- "CRM for SDR manager"
- "best CRM for RevOps manager"
- "CRM for founder-led sales"
- "sales leader CRM workflows"
- "CRM for account executives in SaaS"
Rationale
High-intent buyers often search for tools tailored to their specific job function. By providing granular guides on how a specific role (e.g., RevOps) uses Close to solve their unique problems, the brand can capture underserved long-tail traffic that generic CRM pages miss.
Topical Authority
Close already has a small persona section in its sitemap (e.g., /persona-sales-leader); expanding this leverages their existing reputation for sales leadership and operational excellence.
Internal Data Sources
Use LinkedIn data sources for role enrichment, Close Help Docs for technical setup, and the internal Changelog to provide role-specific proof of recent product improvements.
Estimated Number of Pages
3,000+ (Covering hundreds of job titles across various sales motions and team stages)
This strategy generates technical implementation blueprints that provide the exact data architecture (pipelines, fields, and statuses) needed for different industries. It targets users in the 'how-to' phase of CRM setup who are looking for structured configuration guidance.
Example Keywords
- "sales pipeline stages for SaaS"
- "CRM fields for real estate"
- "opportunity stages for consulting"
- "lead status values for insurance"
- "CRM data model for professional services"
Rationale
Users searching for pipeline stages or field templates are often in the process of switching or setting up a new CRM. Providing these blueprints positions Close as the expert choice that understands their specific business logic.
Topical Authority
Close’s domain authority (45) and existing coverage of sales processes make it a credible source for industry-standard data models.
Internal Data Sources
Leverage API documentation for schema constraints, internal onboarding checklists from Customer Success, and common custom field schemas used by top-performing customers.
Estimated Number of Pages
2,500+ (Covering 300+ industries across multiple business models and deal types)
This play focuses on the operational 'bridge' between lead generation tools and Close. It creates step-by-step automation guides for every possible lead source, showing users exactly how to route, sequence, and follow up with leads automatically.
Example Keywords
- "automate leads from Typeform to CRM"
- "route Calendly leads to sales"
- "Facebook lead ads to Close workflow"
- "G2 lead follow up automation"
- "connect Webflow forms to sales sequence"
Rationale
Integration intent is extremely high-intent; users want to know if their existing stack will work with Close. By moving beyond 'we integrate with X' to 'here is the exact playbook for X,' Close captures users looking for immediate operational efficiency.
Topical Authority
With 61+ existing integration pages and a robust developer portal, Close is already recognized as a highly integrable CRM for modern sales stacks.
Internal Data Sources
Use the existing Integrations directory, workflow automation help docs, and anonymized support ticket patterns to identify common setup challenges.
Estimated Number of Pages
1,500+ (Covering 200+ lead sources across various lead types and response motions)
This strategy scales high-intent 'money pages' (alternatives, vertical-specific CRM pages, and playbooks) across Close's existing international subfolders. It moves beyond translated blog content into localized commercial pages that drive conversions in non-English markets.
Example Keywords
- "alternative à Pipedrive"
- "CRM para inmobiliaria"
- "CRM für Startups"
- "melhor CRM para vendas externas"
- "CRM con llamadas integradas"
Rationale
Close already has a massive international footprint (900+ pages per language), but it is currently under-indexed on commercial keywords. Localizing high-intent page types allows Close to compete with global giants in their local languages.
Topical Authority
The existing localized blog and glossary content provides a strong foundation of topical relevance in French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese.
Internal Data Sources
Utilize localized product truth tables, feature availability matrices by region, and localized versions of the internal Changelog.
Estimated Number of Pages
2,000+ (Distributed across the four primary non-English locales)
This play creates a comprehensive library of objection-handling scripts and proof points derived from real sales interactions. It uses transcribed demo and webinar data to provide 'real-world' responses rather than generic sales advice.
Example Keywords
- "how to handle pricing objections"
- "response to 'we use a competitor' objection"
- "sales script for 'not interested'"
- "overcoming security concerns in sales"
- "handling 'too busy' in cold calling"
Rationale
Sales reps and managers constantly search for actionable scripts to improve their win rates. By anchoring these scripts in Close-specific workflows and proof points, the content becomes a powerful lead magnet for the CRM.
Topical Authority
Close’s 'No BS' brand and extensive library of sales coaching content (e.g., /coaches-corner) make it a highly credible authority on sales execution.
Internal Data Sources
Use AirOps to transcribe anonymized demo recordings, webinar Q&A sessions, and security/compliance documentation to provide factual proof points.
Estimated Number of Pages
2,000+ (Covering hundreds of objection nodes across multiple communication channels)
Improvements Summary
Refresh the “Sales Execution Templates & Playbooks” cluster to match template/example intent: add downloadable Sheets/Docs, copy-paste blocks, scenario-based scripts, and snippet-ready tables/lists near the top. Build two hub pages and tighten internal links across reports, KPIs, scripts, funnels, pipelines, and closing content, with selective product callouts to Close features.
Improvements Details
Prioritize upgrades for /blog/how-to-create-a-sales-report (sales reports, monthly sales report, sales report sample) with 3–5 full samples, a Google Sheets template, and an early “copy/paste outline” plus FAQs. Expand /blog/sales-pitch-scripts and /blog/cold-call-scripts (how to make a sales call script, cold call script) with opening lines, full scripts by scenario, objection rebuttals, and a prominent script template. Differentiate /blog/close-sale (frameworks) vs /blog/sales-closing-phrases (phrase library), then add a “Sales Templates Library” hub and a “Sales Metrics & Reporting” hub with consistent “Related templates” modules and keyword-specific anchors across the cluster.
Improvements Rationale
Several target queries have low competition but low traffic share, indicating page-2 rankings and weak SERP alignment for template-first intent. Adding concrete templates, multiple real examples, and snippet-friendly formatting improves CTR and increases chances of featured snippets and PAA results. Hub-and-spoke linking reduces topical fragmentation (notably the closing pages), concentrates internal authority, and creates clearer paths to relevant Close product pages for higher conversion assist.
Appendix
| Keyword | Volume | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| best seo tools | 5.0k | 3 |
| seo strategy | 4.0k | 5 |
| keyword research | 3.5k | 2 |
| backlink analysis | 3.0k | 4 |
| on-page optimization | 2.5k | 1 |
| local seo | 2.0k | 6 |
| Page | Traffic | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| /seo-tools | 5.0k | 100 |
| /keyword-research | 4.0k | 100 |
| /backlink-checker | 3.5k | 80 |
| /site-audit | 3.0k | 60 |
| /rank-tracker | 2.5k | 50 |
| /content-optimization | 2.0k | 40 |
Ready to Get Growing?
Request access to the best–in–class growth strategies and workflows with AirOps