
Responsive Organic Growth Opportunities
1. Readiness Assessment
1. Readiness Assessment
2. Competitive Analysis
2. Competitive Analysis
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
3. Opportunity Kickstarters
4. Appendix
4. Appendix
Readiness Assessment
Current Performance
- You rank for 8k organic keywords and drive about 19k monthly organic visits (traffic value: $162k), putting you #2 in your direct set behind Upland (~27k visits).
- Your Authority Score is 39, indicating mid-tier domain strength; you have 54k backlinks from ~3k referring domains, which is a solid base but not yet a clear category-leading link profile.
- Traffic is concentrated in a few hubs: the homepage (~5k visits, 24% of total) plus definition/template content like /blog/rfp-vs-rfq-vs-rfi (~2k) and /blog/rfp-examples (~1k); top keywords include “rfpio”, “rfq”, “request for proposal example(s)”, and “seo proposal.”
Growth Opportunity
- The main gap vs. Upland is coverage/scale (they rank for ~17k keywords vs your 8k), suggesting you can grow meaningfully by expanding topic clusters across RFX education, templates, and adjacent procurement/workflow terms.
- You’re capturing strong interest in RFP/RFX informational queries (e.g., “rfp,” “rfq,” “request for proposal”), but there’s room to improve rankings/CTR on high-volume head terms and build more supporting pages to win more of that demand.
- Your content engine is already working (blog pages drive a large share of traffic); systematizing more “definition + example + process + template” series and connecting them to solution pages can push more visits into product-intent searches like “rfp software” and “request for proposal software.”
Assessment
You have a strong SEO foundation (notably in RFP/RFX education) but you’re capped by limited keyword footprint versus the leader. The biggest upside is scaling content and internal linking to expand coverage while lifting performance on core head terms. AirOps can help you execute that expansion systematically and unlock meaningful incremental organic traffic.
Competition at a Glance
Analysis of 2 direct competitors (Loopio and Upland Software) shows Responsive sits in the middle of the pack for organic visibility across this landscape.
Responsive ranks #2 in monthly organic search traffic with 18,753 visits and #2 in ranking keywords with 8,151 keywords—ahead of Loopio but behind Upland Software on both measures.
The top-performing competitor is Upland Software, generating 26,575 monthly organic visits and ranking for 16,614 keywords. This gap is primarily a keyword coverage/scale gap (Upland ranks for roughly 2× as many keywords), while Responsive shows stronger traffic efficiency per keyword, signaling a solid base to defend versus Loopio and a clear visibility ceiling set by Upland’s broader footprint.
Opportunity Kickstarters
Here are your content opportunities, tailored to your domain's strengths. These are starting points for strategic plays that can grow into major traffic drivers in your market. Connect with our team to see the full traffic potential and activate these plays.
A massive library of static pages targeting the exact phrasing of questions found in security, legal, and IT vendor assessments. Each page provides the intent behind the question, a best-practice answer skeleton, and a checklist of required evidence.
Example Keywords
- "how to answer encryption at rest vendor questionnaire"
- "incident response plan questionnaire answer example"
- "subprocessors questionnaire answer"
- "data retention policy vendor due diligence question"
- "business continuity questionnaire answer example"
Rationale
By capturing ultra-long-tail queries related to specific vendor evaluation questions, responsive.io can attract high-intent buyers at the exact moment they are struggling with a response. This moves the brand from generic definitions to high-utility deal execution content.
Topical Authority
The domain already ranks for structured process and definition content; extending this to specific questionnaire answers is a natural progression that leverages existing authority in the RFX space.
Internal Data Sources
Use Community discussion data for real-world phrasing, Help Center articles for operational workflow steps, and SME webinar transcripts for authoritative language.
Estimated Number of Pages
50,000+ (Covering thousands of question stems across various industries and data types)
Step-by-step playbooks for navigating and submitting responses within major buyer sourcing portals like SAP Ariba, Coupa, and Jaggaer. These pages solve the technical friction points vendors face when uploading attachments or managing registration.
Example Keywords
- "how to respond to Ariba sourcing event questionnaire"
- "Coupa supplier portal questionnaire response"
- "Ivalua supplier registration guide"
- "Jaggaer supplier portal attachment upload"
- "Workday Strategic Sourcing supplier response guide"
Rationale
Sourcing portals are a major bottleneck for response teams; providing technical guides for these platforms captures users in a high-stress, high-intent state. This positions responsive.io as the expert in the entire response ecosystem, not just the drafting phase.
Topical Authority
Existing integration pages and developer documentation provide a credible foundation for technical guides related to the procurement software ecosystem.
Internal Data Sources
Leverage Support/Help Center troubleshooting logs, Developer API documentation, and Community Q&A regarding portal-specific limitations.
Estimated Number of Pages
6,000+ (Covering 100+ portals with 50+ specific tasks per portal)
A directory of "attachment packs" that define exactly which documents a vendor needs to provide for specific buyer scenarios. Each page outlines the contents of a pack, such as a "Security Overview Pack" or "Data Privacy Pack," and how to maintain them.
Example Keywords
- "security documentation package for SaaS vendors"
- "incident response documentation checklist for vendor due diligence"
- "data privacy documentation checklist vendor onboarding"
- "BCP DR documentation checklist for suppliers"
- "what documents to provide for vendor security assessment"
Rationale
Vendors often struggle with knowing which evidence artifacts satisfy specific requirements; these blueprints provide immediate value by organizing their internal documentation. This play targets users looking for operational readiness rather than just definitions.
Topical Authority
The site's current success with "how-to" and "template" content makes it a trusted source for operational checklists in the compliance and security space.
Internal Data Sources
Utilize Academy role-based training content, Capability pages for knowledge management, and Help Center versioning/permission guides.
Estimated Number of Pages
12,000+ (Covering hundreds of pack archetypes across various industry and maturity levels)
A library of repeatable operating models for teams managing high volumes of questionnaires and proposals. These pages describe workflows for different team topologies, such as "High-SME-load" or "Global Team" models, including RACI charts and metrics.
Example Keywords
- "security questionnaire review workflow"
- "SME routing process for sales questionnaires"
- "content governance workflow for answer libraries"
- "how to reduce questionnaire turnaround time"
- "approval workflow for vendor assessments"
Rationale
As companies scale, their response processes break; providing proven workflow patterns attracts decision-makers looking for systemic solutions. This play bridges the gap between individual task execution and enterprise-level strategy.
Topical Authority
Responsive.io is already recognized for process-oriented guidance; formalizing these into "workflow patterns" solidifies its position as a leader in Strategic Response Management.
Internal Data Sources
Incorporate Community pain points, Help Center feature behaviors for routing/approvals, and benchmark metrics from industry webinars.
Estimated Number of Pages
3,000+ (Covering various scenarios, team sizes, and departmental ownership models)
A programmatic library focused on the safe and effective operationalization of AI in the response process. It provides role-specific AI policies, approved prompt templates, and QA checklists for reviewing AI-generated compliance answers.
Example Keywords
- "AI policy for sales teams using generative AI"
- "prompt template for vendor security questionnaire"
- "how to review AI-generated compliance answers"
- "AI governance checklist for customer questionnaires"
- "approved prompts for sales engineering teams"
Rationale
With the rapid adoption of AI, teams are searching for governance frameworks to ensure accuracy and security. This play targets the "how-to" of AI implementation, which is a high-growth area with significant search volume.
Topical Authority
The brand's existing AI ethics page and product-centric AI content provide the necessary credibility to offer authoritative governance advice.
Internal Data Sources
Use the AI Ethics page, Help Center "Setting up AI Assistant" guides, and Academy training modules for AI usage.
Estimated Number of Pages
5,000+ (Covering various roles, risk tolerances, and industry-specific use cases)
Improvements Summary
Create a single RFP pillar page that links out to each template/how-to post, then add consistent cross-links and a fixed “Related resources” module to tighten the cluster. Update priority posts with copy/paste templates, downloadable assets, snippet-ready definitions, and FAQs to match what is winning on the SERP.
Improvements Details
Rework key pages around mapped keywords like "request for proposal example" (/blog/rfp-examples), "request for proposal process" (/blog/rfp-process-guide), "rfp email template" (/blog/rfp-invitation-email-to-vendors), and "rfp evaluation criteria" (/blog/rfp-evaluation-criteria). Add 1–3 templates per page plus at least one download (RFP example pack, process checklist, scoring matrix spreadsheet, email scripts), then add a TOC, tight H2s (e.g., “RFP process steps”), and 5–8 FAQs with FAQPage/HowTo schema where relevant. Reduce cannibalization by giving each comms page a single job (invitation vs vendor response vs award vs rejection) and interlink them as an “RFP communications kit,” with soft CTAs to relevant product pages after the template sections.
Improvements Rationale
The cluster targets high-volume terms with low current traffic share, so better SERP matching (templates, downloads, short definitions, FAQs) should raise rankings and win more long-tail queries. A hub-and-spoke structure with consistent internal links helps search engines read the site as a topical reference rather than isolated articles, while tighter intent separation prevents pages from competing against each other. Soft CTAs placed after informational value can increase product interest without disrupting the primary how-to intent.
Appendix
| Keyword | Volume | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| best seo tools | 5.0k | 3 |
| seo strategy | 4.0k | 5 |
| keyword research | 3.5k | 2 |
| backlink analysis | 3.0k | 4 |
| on-page optimization | 2.5k | 1 |
| local seo | 2.0k | 6 |
| Page | Traffic | Traffic % |
|---|---|---|
| /seo-tools | 5.0k | 100 |
| /keyword-research | 4.0k | 100 |
| /backlink-checker | 3.5k | 80 |
| /site-audit | 3.0k | 60 |
| /rank-tracker | 2.5k | 50 |
| /content-optimization | 2.0k | 40 |
Ready to Get Growing?
Request access to the best–in–class growth strategies and workflows with AirOps